Last 10 THreads :         cheap wholesale jordans,air dunk,nike air force one,nike shoes,sneakers,puma shoes,ni (Last Post : weose33 - Replies : 1 - Views : 6 )           »          cheap wholesale jordans,air dunk,nike air force one,nike shoes,sneakers,puma shoes,ni (Last Post : weose33 - Replies : 2 - Views : 9 )           »          ★Hot shoes,clothing,bags and so on,unbelievable price!!! (Last Post : weose33 - Replies : 1 - Views : 12 )           »          We cheap wholesale nike Shox,jordan Shox,PUMA shoes,D&G,GUCCI shoes,adidas shoes , (Last Post : weose33 - Replies : 4 - Views : 32 )           »          Cheap wholesale / sell nike jordan fusion shoes ed (Last Post : weose33 - Replies : 1 - Views : 4 )           »          www.nikeshoesstock.com cheap clothing wholesale jordans (Last Post : popular2008 - Replies : 0 - Views : 3 )           »          www.nikeshoesstock.com cheap clothing (Last Post : popular2008 - Replies : 0 - Views : 5 )           »          Cheap wholesale / sell nike jordan fusion shoes ed (Last Post : nikejordanaaa - Replies : 0 - Views : 5 )           »          Cheap wholesale / sell nike jordan fusion shoes ed (Last Post : nikejordanaaa - Replies : 0 - Views : 5 )           »          Nikejordanaaa.com wholesale / sell nike jordan fusion shoes (Last Post : nikejordanaaa - Replies : 0 - Views : 3 )           »         


  
Go Back   Cingular Users Forum to discuss Our Favorite Service > Cingular Infomation > Cingular Service
Tags: , , , ,

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Civilized rich? (Was: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone)
  #201 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
The Natural Philosopher
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Civilized rich? (Was: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone)

none wrote:
> ultimauw@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> None, you really need to spend time in areas such as post-Katrina Gulf
>>>> Coast. You are really immature and need to learn how other people live
>>>> who must work to support their children by putting food on the table and
>>>> a roof over their heads. After all, spoiled rich brats like Paris
>>>> Hilton, Nicole Richie, Lindsay Lohan, etc. are far less civilized than
>>>> the people who are paid to cook their food and make their beds.
>>> listen thomas, you create your own reality... and for me, i do not
>>> choose to live in scummy areas like the katrina gulf coast. if it were
>>> up to me, i'd bulldoze everything 150 miles in from the coast, make it a
>>> national park and be done with. trying to rebuild america's worst
>>> societal wort, is non-productive and unhealthy for everyone.

>> Thanks for reminding us why we need to fight the elite and not let
>> them get away with the shit
>> they are pulling. Additudes like this are the reason why the elite is
>> so hated among decent people.

>
> i didn't sense any "elite" talk in my post, it was all about being
> rational with "money". That area has NEVER BEEN FIT to live in, for
> 1000's of years, it's a freaking swamp! so why should tax payers rebuild
> in an area that even the Indians avoided?
>


Obviously to shove the fucking niggers in, to rot?

I would have thought that you, of all people, would have got that one
worked out...;-)

> Think before you post, thanks!
>
> You must be from the south? is that the problem?

Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #202 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Tr=E4ger?=
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> none <a@b.com> wrote:
> > yes, there is some of that, i'll agree. but ALL
> > phones will now work like the iPhone in 10 years,

>
> Nope, just like all computers dont work like the Mac
> and all music players dont work like ipods either.


And yet almost all try to work like the Mac. Have you heard about that
thing called Windows yet? DOS lost. Even most Linux boxen run a GUI
(imitating the imitation).
--
Lars T.
Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #203 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Tr=E4ger?=
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:

> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:5fkvidF3d847cU1@mid.individual.net:
>
> >
> > Phones havent changed that much in 10 years.
> >

>
> Not much, except for:
>
> Cameras
> Customizable Screens
> Customizable [url=http://www.unlimitedcomplimentaryringtones.com]Ringtones[/url]
> Email capability
> Internet capability
> Calendars
> GPS
> Music capability
> Video capability
> Bluetooth capability
>
> to name a few.


You forgot "much harder to make phone calls with".
--
Lars T.
Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #204 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
thepixelfreak
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

On 2007-07-12 16:22:12 -0700, Lars.Traeger@epost.de
(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_Tr=E4ger?=) said:

> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> none <a@b.com> wrote:
>>> yes, there is some of that, i'll agree. but ALL
>>> phones will now work like the iPhone in 10 years,

>>
>> Nope, just like all computers dont work like the Mac
>> and all music players dont work like ipods either.

>
> And yet almost all try to work like the Mac. Have you heard about that
> thing called Windows yet? DOS lost. Even most Linux boxen run a GUI
> (imitating the imitation).


Don't be too smug.. Apple didn't invent the GUI. Don't get me wrong.
I'm firmly in the Apple camp. But let credit lie where it deserves to
be.
--

thepixelfreak

Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #205 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
George
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

Lars Träger wrote:
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> none <a@b.com> wrote:
>>> yes, there is some of that, i'll agree. but ALL
>>> phones will now work like the iPhone in 10 years,

>> Nope, just like all computers dont work like the Mac
>> and all music players dont work like ipods either.

>
> And yet almost all try to work like the Mac. Have you heard about that
> thing called Windows yet? DOS lost. Even most Linux boxen run a GUI
> (imitating the imitation).


You left out one level of imitation.
Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #206 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
Rod Speed
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

Lars Träger <Lars.Traeger@epost.de> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> none <a@b.com> wrote


>>> yes, there is some of that, i'll agree. but ALL
>>> phones will now work like the iPhone in 10 years,


>> Nope, just like all computers dont work like the Mac
>> and all music players dont work like ipods either.


> And yet almost all try to work like the Mac.


No they dont, Win has been off on a completely
different route for a hell of a long time now.

> Have you heard about that thing called Windows yet?


That didnt end up like the Mac at the time it started.

> DOS lost.


Different matter entirely.

> Even most Linux boxen run a GUI (imitating the imitation).


Its been hilarious that they imitate Win, not the Mac.

And phones certainly arent going to all end up working like the iphone either.
There will be plenty with physical buttons in 10 years, you watch.

There will be some high end PDAs with real keyboards too, you watch.

And laptops wont be doing without physical keyboards either, you watch.


Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #207 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
Rod Speed
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

"Lars Träger" <Lars.Traeger@epost.de> wrote:
> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote:
>
>> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:5fkvidF3d847cU1@mid.individual.net:
>>
>>>
>>> Phones havent changed that much in 10 years.
>>>

>>
>> Not much, except for:
>>
>> Cameras
>> Customizable Screens
>> Customizable [url=http://www.unlimitedcomplimentaryringtones.com]Ringtones[/url]
>> Email capability
>> Internet capability
>> Calendars
>> GPS
>> Music capability
>> Video capability
>> Bluetooth capability
>>
>> to name a few.

>
> You forgot "much harder to make phone calls with".


Nope, much easier actually, most obviously with speed dial keys and voice dialing etc.


Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #208 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
aemeijers
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone


"none" <a@b.com> wrote in message
news:a-918EDA.20583311072007@mpls-nnrp-06.inet.qwest.net...
> Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:
>
>> No, he's saying iPhone owners will be stuck using EDGE often, because Wi-
>> Fi is often unavailable, so they won't see the snappy performance
>> displayed in the iPhone commercials.
>>
>> iPhone owners don't get the luxury of subscribing to EVDO.

>
> 90% of your waking life, you have access to free wifi, home of course
> you do and at work you do, so sure while driving you don't, but you
> shouldn't be chatting while driving, so it doesn't matter.

Get a clue. In most of north america, wi-fi just isn't that common. Only
recent (last 3-4 years) broadband users likely have wi-fi at home. Many,
many corporate networks, and virtually all government networks, consider
wi-fi a security risk and do not use it. Those that do, lock it down
heavily. The whole world ain't silicon valley or whatever snooty geek
paradise you are posting from. Unless you live in a library or coffee shop
(or around here, Salvation Army, of all places), free wi-fi just isn't that
common.

aem sends.....


Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #209 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
Rod Speed
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote
> aemeijers <aemeijers@att.net> wrote
>> none <a@b.com> wrote
>>> Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote


>>>> No, he's saying iPhone owners will be stuck using EDGE often,
>>>> because Wi- Fi is often unavailable, so they won't see the snappy
>>>> performance displayed in the iPhone commercials.


>>>> iPhone owners don't get the luxury of subscribing to EVDO.


>>> 90% of your waking life, you have access to free wifi, home of
>>> course you do and at work you do, so sure while driving you don't,
>>> but you shouldn't be chatting while driving, so it doesn't matter.


>> Get a clue. In most of north america, wi-fi just isn't that common.
>> Only recent (last 3-4 years) broadband users likely have wi-fi at
>> home. Many, many corporate networks, and virtually all government
>> networks, consider wi-fi a security risk and do not use it. Those
>> that do, lock it down heavily. The whole world ain't silicon valley
>> or whatever snooty geek paradise you are posting from. Unless you
>> live in a library or coffee shop (or around here, Salvation Army, of
>> all places), free wi-fi just isn't that common.


> There's just one problem with your statement.


We'll see...

> More and more cities are gearing up to provide
> free or reduce cost wi-fi coverage, city-wide.


Bullshit on that city wide claim.

> In many areas, its damned near impossible to go
> without finding some idiot's unsecured wi-fi router.


Thats theft.

> Even more and more corporate campuses are going with wi-fi.


And fuck all of those are open to everyone.

> I recently attended a meeting on a Saturday in a corporate park a few
> miles outside of Philly and I had no problem finding wi-fi access there.


Doesnt say a damned thing about what he said.


Reply With Quote

Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone
  #210 (permalink)  
Old 07-13-2007, 02:45 AM
Kurt
 
Posts: n/a
Diggs:
Default Re: Apple plans cheaper, Nano-based phone

In article <5fo2mnF39q6h4U1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kurt <labolide@spacegmail.com> wrote
> > Lars.Traeger@epost.de (Lars Träger) wrote
> >> Scott <how.do@you.do> wrote
> >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>
> >>>> Phones havent changed that much in 10 years.

>
> >>> Not much, except for:

>
> >>> Cameras
> >>> Customizable Screens
> >>> Customizable [url=http://www.unlimitedcomplimentaryringtones.com]Ringtones[/url]
> >>> Email capability
> >>> Internet capability
> >>> Calendars
> >>> GPS
> >>> Music capability
> >>> Video capability
> >>> Bluetooth capability

>
> >>> to name a few.

>
> >> You forgot "much harder to make phone calls with".

>
> > Which is why the iPhone is so successful.

>
> Bullshit, none of the suckers bought it for that reason.
>
> > No other phone comes close for simple ease of use and functionality.

>
> Bare faced lie with making phone calls.


I actually used one. You have never even touched one. Right?
Aren't you in UK (no iPhones)? LOL.

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 PM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk